291p
How does Stephen Moss introduce his review in paragraph 1?

By blaming television for people’s feelings of horror towards alpha predators.

By correcting the mistaken view that most people have of alpha predators.

By focusing on the special fascination that people have for alpha predators.

By questioning the commercial exploitation of people’s fear of alpha predators.
301p
Which aspect of the book
Monster of God does paragraph 2 deal with?

The history of human attitudes and behaviour towards alpha predators.

The human inability to understand the behaviour of alpha predators.

The reasons why humans are so deeply impressed by alpha predators.

The view that humans have proved to be superior to alpha predators.
“it may now be too late” (paragraph 3)
321p
Why does Quammen bring up the story about Ceausescu, according to paragraph 4?

To demonstrate the senseless cruelty of the Romanian dictator.

To point out how people can abuse their power over animals.

To show his disgust at the brutal killing of alpha predators.

To stress the urgent need for wildlife protection.
332p
Geef voor elk van de onderstaande uitspraken aan of deze op grond van alinea 5 of 6 wel of
niet overeenkomt met de mening van Stephen Moss over Monster of God.
1 De inhoud van het boek heeft niets te maken met de ondertitel.
2 Er is te weinig samenhang in het boek.
3 Het boek besteedt te weinig aandacht aan haaien.
4 Het boek is minder geslaagd dan Quammens eerste boek.
Noteer het nummer van elke uitspraak, gevolgd door “wel” of “niet”.
341p
How could paragraph 8 be summarised?

The more educational wildlife programmes are, the more people enjoy them.

The more wildlife programmes we watch, the less we seem to learn from them.

Those who have little to fear from alpha predators know a lot about them.

Those who show most interest in alpha predators also kill most of them.